Client or Legal Advocate, Which Role Suits You Better?

Client or Legal Advocate, which role suits you better? To answer that question, we should first define what a client and legal advocate is. Clients refer to anyone no matter their status or position who posts a question on the Legist app. A client could be a school teacher, a college student, a janitor, a doctor or even a lawyer. As long as you post anything, you have achieved client status.

On the other hand, an advocate is anyone who replies and satisfies the curiosity of a client. Just like clients, advocates can be anyone who believes they have important information that would satisfy the client. The advocate could be knowledgeable about the law or could just be speaking from personal experience. Nevertheless, all inputs of any kind are welcome.

In order to use the Legist app, users must make a choice to sign in as a client or an advocate. To find out which fits you, learning the qualities of each side will help. Clients are those who ask questions, so on the client side of the app, you can ask a question by posting about it. You can also access the various categories that personify the nature of the question being asked. Finally, only clients can invite friends to the app.

On the other hand, advocates cannot post questions, but they can reply and comment on posted questions. But perhaps the most important ability of an advocate is their ability to initiate a chat with any clients of their choice, in order to provide a more in depth and personal answer to their questions.

Both sides of the app offer different benefits to the app users and to find which role suits you better, simply follow this guideline and choose the side that aligns the most with your values and goals.

Share the most Insane Is this even Legal stories?

I have a deep love for reading what people have experienced and trying to learn from their specific situation. I’d rather listen to people who’ve lived insane and uniquely bizarre lives casually share stories from their past from a legal point of view.

Individuals have survived outright foolish circumstances, situations, and encounters with the legal system. There are not many things I truly appreciate more than paying attention to the people who have driven unimaginably intriguing lives, recounting their story and experience.

This explains why I’ve always been drawn to reading legal questions and answers. Especially ones written by those who have lived litigious, chaotic and surreal lives.

Why do you need a story? We all recount tales about ourselves. Stories characterize us. To understand somebody well is to know their story—the encounters that have molded them, the preliminaries and defining moments that have defined them. At some point, we need somebody to understand us. We share accounts of our childhoods, our families, our school years, our first loves, the improvement of our political perspectives, etc.

By “story” we don’t signify “something made up to make a terrible circumstance look great.” Rather, we’re discussing accounts that are profoundly evident thus captivating that audience members feel they have a stake in our life experience. The Legist platform is filled with this dynamic, without a story there is no platform to deliver professional connection to relate to the individual.

Recounting a story that occurred in our personal lives might be terrifying. “Will I think back one day and think this was the best thing that consistently occurred?” we ask ourselves. “Or on the other hand will I understand that this was the start of something positive in my life, that it was a breeze from here on out?” We desperately try to find common ground with those around us by sharing these vulnerable moments of our lives.

I’m 24 and looking back I think I’ve gotten through my life without any real scary moments. Well, there probably have been some, but none serious enough for me to be able to remember now.

Anyway, have you had any moments where you’ve been terrified or creeped out or been in any sketchy situations? If so then I want to hear your story. Please post it on Legist

Crowdsourcing Your Legal Issues

Organizations are presently utilizing talk rooms and common spaces to interface with customers, different workplaces and expected clients. From one-on-one talks to rooms created for specific topics, these spaces are brimming with customers with common backgrounds. Legal talk has a spot in pretty much every organization. Organizations must utilize a group chat like structure inside the organization or on their site to interact with clients rapidly. 

Conceptualizing a group chat space for legal issues gives a protected area for clients with similar issues to converse while sharing their extensive knowledge with other users. 

Since these spaces can be limited by those who are involved with legal issues and a legal community, Legal Advocates can share their opinion and experience in each space. The Public also gets access to each room but cannot participate or utilize the group space like an active user.

Legal Rep working together can meet in Legist room and talk about issues while conceptualizing a powerful collaboration arrangement. The constant cooperation doesn’t expect clients to sit near a meeting framework speaker, making it more agreeable. Besides, text based talk can be saved on the servers and put something aside for future reference. It’s both helpful and straightforward for organizations and their clients. 

Legist is turning out to be more normal for Legal Rep as an approach to give moment answers to client questions. Clients regularly really like to utilize legist room to abstain from managing irritating telephone menus or long deferrals with email correspondence. Organizations can allocate more time so clients can pose inquiries and talk with a genuine Legal Rep during certain working hours. Giving moment satisfaction further develops client relations and assists Legal Rep with assisting their clients’ necessities. 

Assembling Legal help for a particular problem is regularly a troublesome cycle for organizations. For organizations that acquire experts or specialists, preparing can likewise be amazingly costly. Legist gives a lower cost and simpler to plan alternative for Legal Rep preparing to answer a problem. Legal Reps additionally can be close by to the conversations in the Legist group setting.

Legist allows Legal Reps to stay in the same work areas for answering or responding to clients concerns, they don’t need to shut down programs or invest energy trying to find the right client to support. Thus, Legal Reps are more effective and can retrieve records quickly when inquiries are posed.